Java regex email

Em primeiro lugar, eu sei que usar regex para e-mail não é recomendado, mas tenho que testar isso.

Eu tenho este regex:

\b[A-Z0-9._%-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}\b

Em Java, eu fiz isso:

Pattern p = Pattern.compile("\\b[A-Z0-9._%-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Z]{2,4}\\b");
Matcher m = p.matcher("foobar@gmail.com");

if (m.find())
    System.out.println("Correct!");

No entanto, a regex falha independentemente de o e-mail ser bem-formado ou não. Um "localizar e substituir" dentro do Eclipse funciona bem com o mesmo regex.

Qualquer ideia?

Obrigado,

FWIW, aqui está o código Java que usamos para validar endereços de e-mail. Os Regexp são muito semelhantes:

public static final Pattern VALID_EMAIL_ADDRESS_REGEX = 
    Pattern.compile("^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Z]{2,6}$", Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE);

public static boolean validate(String emailStr) {
        Matcher matcher = VALID_EMAIL_ADDRESS_REGEX.matcher(emailStr);
        return matcher.find();
}

Funciona de forma bastante confiável.

Aqui está o regex compatível com RFC822 adaptado para Java:

Pattern ptr = Pattern.compile("(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:(?:(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*\\<(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)?(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*\\>(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)|(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:(?:(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*\\<(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)?(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*\\>(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:,\\s*(?:(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*\\<(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)?(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\"(?:[^\\\"\\r\\\\]|\\\\.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\"(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\"()<>@,;:\\\\\".\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r\\\\]|\\\\.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*\\>(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*)?;\\s*)");
String[] emails = { "\"Fred Bloggs\"@example.com", "user@.invalid.com", "Chuck Norris <gmail@chucknorris.com>", "webmaster@müller.de", "matteo@78.47.122.114" };
for (String email : emails) {
    System.out.println(email + " is " + (ptr.matcher(email).matches() ? "valid" : "invalid"));
}

Resultado:

"Fred Bloggs"@example.com is valid
user@.invalid.com is invalid
Chuck Norris <gmail@chucknorris.com> is valid
webmaster@müller.de is valid
matteo@78.47.122.114 is valid

O regex foi retirado deste post: Mail :: RFC822 :: Address: validação de endereço baseado em regexp . Os resultados devem coincidir com a versão online .

Não.Você nunca terminará com uma expressão válida.

Por exemplo, estes são todos os endereços de e-mail válidos:

"Abc\@def"@example.com
"Fred Bloggs"@example.com
"Joe\\Blow"@example.com
"Abc@def"@example.com
customer/department=shipping@examp­ le.com
$A12345@example.com
!def!xyz%abc@example.com
_somename@example.com
matteo(this is a comment).corti@example.com
root@[127.0.0.1]

Apenas para mencionar alguns problemas:

• você não considera as muitas formas de especificar um host (por exemplo, pelo endereço IP)
• você sente falta de personagens válidos
• você sente falta de nomes de domínio não ASCII

Antes mesmo de começar, verifique os RFCs correspondentes

Isso é porque você está esquecendo a não diferenciação de maiúsculas e minúsculas:

Pattern regex = Pattern.compile("\\b[\\w.%-]+@[-.\\w]+\\.[A-Za-z]{2,4}\\b");

Isso corresponde ao seu exemplo, embora ignore muitos e-mails válidos.

Outra alternativa simples para validar 99% dos e-mails

public static final String EMAIL_VERIFICATION = "^([\\w-\\.]+){1,64}@([\\w&&[^_]]+){2,255}.[a-z]{2,}$";

Este é um regex válido para validar e-mails. É totalmente compatível com RFC822 e aceita endereços IP e nomes de servidores (para fins de intranet).

public static boolean isEmailValid(String email) {
    final Pattern EMAIL_REGEX = Pattern.compile("[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*@(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?", Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE);
    return EMAIL_REGEX.matcher(email).matches();
}

Aqui estão alguns exemplos de saída, quando você chama isEmailValid(emailVariable):

john@somewhere.com // valid
john.foo@somewhere.com // valid
john.foo+label@somewhere.com // valid (with +label - Gmail accepts it!)
john@192.168.1.10 // valid (with IP addresses)
john+label@192.168.1.10 // valid (with +label and IP address)
john.foo@someserver // valid (with no first domain level)
JOHN.FOO@somewhere.com // valid (case insensitive)
@someserver // invalid
@someserver.com // invalid
john@. // invalid
.@somewhere.com // invalid

Maching está definido como CASE_INSENSITIVE ?

Você pode usar este método para validar o endereço de e-mail em java.

public class EmailValidator {
    private Pattern pattern;
    private Matcher matcher;

    private static final String EMAIL_PATTERN = 
        "^[_A-Za-z0-9-\\+]+(\\.[_A-Za-z0-9-]+)*@"
        + "[A-Za-z0-9-]+(\\.[A-Za-z0-9]+)*(\\.[A-Za-z]{2,})$";

    public EmailValidator() {
        pattern = Pattern.compile(EMAIL_PATTERN);
    }

    /**
    * Validate hex with regular expression
    * 
    * @param hex
    *            hex for validation
    * @return true valid hex, false invalid hex
    */
    public boolean validate(final String hex) {

    matcher = pattern.matcher(hex);
    return matcher.matches();

    }
}

Formato de e-mail geral (RE) que inclui também domínios como co.in, co.uk, com, outlook.com etc.

E a regra diz que:

• Letras maiúsculas e minúsculas em inglês (az, AZ)
• Dígitos 0 a 9
• Personagens ! # $% & '* + - / =? ^ _ `{| } ~ Personagem.

• (ponto, ponto final, ponto final) desde que não seja o primeiro nem o último caractere, e desde que também não apareça duas ou mais vezes consecutivas.

  [a-zA-Z0-9]+[._a-zA-Z0-9!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~]*[a-zA-Z]*@[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,8}.[a-zA-Z.]{2,6}

Modificação da resposta de Armer B. que não validou e-mails terminados em '.co.uk'

public static boolean emailValidate(String email) {
    Matcher matcher = Pattern.compile("^([\\w-\\.]+){1,64}@([\\w&&[^_]]+){2,255}(.[a-z]{2,3})+$|^$", Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE).matcher(email);

    return matcher.find();
}

Regex: ^[\\w!#$%&’*+/=?{|} ~ ^ -] + (?: \. [\ W! # $% & '* + / =?{|}~^-]+)*@(?:[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,6}$

public static boolean isValidEmailId(String email) {
        String emailPattern = "^[\\w!#$%&’*+/=?`{|}~^-]+(?:\\.[\\w!#$%&’*+/=?`{|}~^-]+)*@(?:[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,6}$";
        Pattern p = Pattern.compile(emailPattern);
        Matcher m = p.matcher(email);
        return m.matches();
    }

Se você quiser permitir caracteres não latinos, este funciona muito bem para mim.

"^[\\p{L}\\p{N}\\._%+-]+@[\\p{L}\\p{N}\\.\\-]+\\.[\\p{L}]{2,}$"

Não permite IPs após @, mas a maioria dos e-mails válidos em de de xxx@xxx.TDLpodem ser validados com ele. \p{L}valida letras UTF e \p{N}valida números UTF. Você pode verificar este documento para mais informações.

Tente o código abaixo para e-mail no formato de

jsmith@example.com

1ª parte -jsmith 2ª parte-@example.com

1. In the 1 part it will allow 0-9,A-Z,dot sign(.),underscore sign(_)
 2. In the 2 part it will allow A-Z, must be @ and .

^[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+@[a-zA-Z.]+?\.[a-zA-Z]{2,3}$

Eu testei isso abaixo regular expressionpara pontos únicos e múltiplos consecutivos no domainnome -

([A-Za-z0-9-_.]+@[A-Za-z0-9-_]+(?:\.[A-Za-z0-9]+)+)

e aqui estão os exemplos que foram completamente cumpridos acima regex.

End_user@live.com
End.u@exm-tech.net
enduser9876@gmail.in
end_user@mywebsite.ac.in.gui
Another984.User2@mail.edu.sg
Another987_User5@mail.show.au
Slow_User@example_domain.au.in
iamthemostsimpleremailhere@example.com

Eu tentei cobrir o máximo comumente usado email id's validation por este ilustrado acimaregex e ainda funcionando ...

Se você ainda sabe que algum uso consequencial email id'sfoi deixado aqui, por favor me avise na seção de comentários!

String emailRegex = "[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+@[a-zA-Z0-9]+.[a-zA-Z]{2,3}[.] {0,1}[a-zA-Z]+";
Pattern.matches(emailRegex,"You_Input_Mail_Id");

Esta é a regex para corresponder a endereços de e-mail válidos.

você pode usar uma expressão regular simples para validar a id do e-mail,

public boolean validateEmail(String email){
  return Pattern.matches("[_a-zA-Z1-9]+(\\.[A-Za-z0-9]*)*@[A-Za-z0-9]+\\.[A-Za-z0-9]+(\\.[A-Za-z0-9]*)*", email)
}

Descrição :

1. [_a-zA-Z1-9] + - aceitará todos AZ, az, 0-9 e _ (+ significa que deve ocorrer)
2. (\. [A-Za-z0-9] ) - é opcional e aceita. e AZ, az, 0-9 (* significa opcional)
3. @ [A-Za-z0-9] + - aceitará @ e AZ, az, 0-9
4. \. [A-Za-z0-9] + - é para. e AZ, az, 0-9
5. (\. [A-Za-z0-9] ) - ocorrer,. mas é opcional

Você pode verificar se os e-mails são válidos ou não usando essas bibliotecas e, claro, pode adicionar array para este projeto a seguir.

import org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator;

public class Email{
    public static void main(String[] args){
        EmailValidator email = EmailVlidator.getInstance();
        boolean val = email.isValid("george.parcks@gmail.com");
        System.out.println("Mail is: "+val);
        val = email.isValid("hans.riguer.hotmsil.com");
        System.out.print("Mail is: "+val");
    }
}

resultado :

Mail is: true

Correio é: falso

import java.util.Scanner;

public class CheckingTheEmailPassword {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        String email = null;
        String password = null;
        Boolean password_valid = false;
        Boolean email_valid = false;

        Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
        do {
            System.out.println("Enter your email: ");
            email = input.nextLine();

            System.out.println("Enter your passsword: ");
            password = input.nextLine();

            // checks for words,numbers before @symbol and between "@" and ".".
            // Checks only 2 or 3 alphabets after "."
            if (email.matches("[\\w]+@[\\w]+\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,3}"))
                email_valid = true;
            else
                email_valid = false;

            // checks for NOT words,numbers,underscore and whitespace.
            // checks if special characters present
            if ((password.matches(".*[^\\w\\s].*")) &&
            // checks alphabets present
                    (password.matches(".*[a-zA-Z].*")) &&
                    // checks numbers present
                    (password.matches(".*[0-9].*")) &&
                    // checks length
                    (password.length() >= 8))
                password_valid = true;
            else
                password_valid = false;

            if (password_valid && email_valid)
                System.out.println(" Welcome User!!");
            else {
                if (!email_valid)
                    System.out.println(" Re-enter your email: ");
                if (!password_valid)
                    System.out.println(" Re-enter your password: ");
            }

        } while (!email_valid || !password_valid);

        input.close();

    }

}

Graças à resposta de @Jason Buberel, acho que as letras minúsculas devem ser validadas pelo RegEX. Portanto, o seguinte está correto:

[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,6}

Agora, ambos developer961@mail.com e DEV961@yahoo.COM são válidos!
Observe que \. deve ser \\. escapar . e tem \. em si. Desde ,. é um caractere significativo em java RegEX significa todos os caracteres.

Regex para validação semelhante ao Facebook:

public static final String REGEX_EMAIL_VALIDATION = "^[\\w-\\+]+(\\.[\\w]+)*@[\\w-]+(\\.[\\w]+)*(\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,})$";

Dto para testes de unidade (com Lombok):

@Data
@Accessors(chain = true)
@FieldDefaults(level = AccessLevel.PRIVATE)
public class UserCreateDto {

    @NotNull
    @Pattern(regexp = REGEX_EMAIL_VALIDATION)
    @Size(min = 1, max = 254)
    String email;
}

Emails válidos / inválidos abaixo com testes de unidade:

public class UserCreateValidationDtoTest {

private static final String[] VALID_EMAILS = new String[]{"email@yahoo.com", "email-100@yahoo.com",
        "Email.100@yahoo.com", "email111@email.com", "email-100@email.net",
        "email.100@email.com.au", "emAil@1.com", "email@gmail.com.com",
        "email+100@gmail.com", "emAil-100@yahoo-test.com", "email_100@yahoo-test.ABC.CoM"};
private static final String[] INVALID_EMAILS = new String[]{"あいうえお@example.com", "email@111",
        "email", "email@.com.my", "email123@gmail.", "email123@.com", "email123@.com.com",
        ".email@email.com", "email()*@gmAil.com", "eEmail()*@gmail.com", "email@%*.com", "email..2002@gmail.com",
        "email.@gmail.com", "email@email@gmail.com", "email@gmail.com."};
private Validator validator;

@Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
    ValidatorFactory factory = Validation.buildDefaultValidatorFactory();
    validator = factory.getValidator();
}

@Test
public void emailValidationShouldBeValid() throws Exception {
    Arrays.stream(VALID_EMAILS)
            .forEach(email -> {
                        Set<ConstraintViolation<UserCreateDto>> violations = validateEmail(
                                new UserCreateDto().setEmail(email));
                        System.out.println("Email: " + email + ", violations: " + violations);
                        Assert.assertTrue(violations.isEmpty());
                    }
            );
}

@Test
public void emailValidationShouldBeNotValid() throws Exception {
    Arrays.stream(INVALID_EMAILS)
            .forEach(email -> {
                        Set<ConstraintViolation<UserCreateDto>> violations = validateEmail(
                                new UserCreateDto().setEmail(email));
                        System.out.println("Email: " + email + ", violations: " + violations);
                        Assert.assertTrue(!violations.isEmpty());
                    }
            );
}


private Set<ConstraintViolation<UserCreateDto>> validateEmail(UserCreateDto user) {
    String emailFieldName = "email";
    return validator.validateProperty(user, emailFieldName);
}

}