Túnel vpn do Strongswan conectado, mas o tráfego não é roteado através dele

15

Acabei de configurar um túnel VPN site a site com strongswan (4.5). O túnel parece bom e conectado ao outro lado, mas parece que há um problema no roteamento de tráfego através do túnel.

Qualquer ideia?

Obrigado!

Diagrama de rede

+----------------------------------+
|Dedicated server: starfleet       |                   +-----------------+
|                                  |                   |  CISCO ASA      |
|        +-------------------------|     internet      |                 |
|        |eth0: XX.XX.XX.195/29    +-------------------|  YY.YYY.YYY.155 |
|        +-------------------------|                   +------+----------+
|        |virbr1: 192.168.100.1/24 |                          |
|        +----+--------------------|                          |
|             |                    |                          |
|             |                    |                   +-----------------+
|             |                    |                   |network          |
|     +-------+                    |                   |                 |
|     |                            |                   |172.30.20.0/27   |
|     |                            |                   +-----------------+
| +------------------------------+ |
| | kvm server: enterprise       | |
| |                              | |
| |                              | |
| | eth0: 192.168.100.100/24     | |
| +------------------------------+ |
+----------------------------------+

Programas

  • debian wheezy
  • strongswan 4.5.2-1.5 + deb7u1
  • kvm e libvirt (rede 192.168.100.x)

/etc/ipsec.conf

root@starfleet ~ # cat /etc/ipsec.conf
# ipsec.conf - strongSwan IPsec configuration file

# basic configuration

config setup
    plutodebug="all"
    plutostderrlog=/var/log/pluto-ipsec
    charonstart=no
    plutostart=yes

conn net-net
     ikelifetime=86400s
     keylife=3600s
     rekeymargin=3m
     keyingtries=1
     keyexchange=ikev1
     authby=secret
     ike=aes256-sha-modp1024!
     esp=aes256-sha
     right=YY.YYY.YYY.155
     rightsubnet=172.30.20.0/27
     left=XX.XX.XX.195
     leftsubnet=192.168.100.0/24
     leftfirewall=yes
     pfs=no
     auto=add

Ipsec up

root@starfleet ~ # ipsec up net-net
002 "net-net" #1: initiating Main Mode
102 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I1: initiate
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION c0000000]
104 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, expecting MR2
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]
003 "net-net" #1: received Vendor ID payload [XAUTH]
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [###############################]
003 "net-net" #1: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Cisco VPN 3000 Series]
106 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expecting MR3
002 "net-net" #1: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: 'YY.YYY.YYY.155'
002 "net-net" #1: ISAKMP SA established
004 "net-net" #1: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established
002 "net-net" #2: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP {using isakmp#1}
110 "net-net" #2: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate
002 "net-net" #2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x8a12ab22 <0xa01abba1}
004 "net-net" #2: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x8a12ab22     <0xa01abba1}

root@starfleet ~ # ipsec status
000 "net-net":     192.168.100.0/24===XX.XX.XX.195[XX.XX.XX.195]...YY.YYY.YYY.155[YY.YYY.YYY.155]===172.30.20. 0/27; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "net-net":   newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2; 
000 
000 #2: "net-net" STATE_QUICK_I2 (sent QI2, IPsec SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3331s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner
000 #2: "net-net" esp.8a12ab22@YY.YYY.YYY.155 (0 bytes) esp.a01abba1@XX.XX.XX.195 (0 bytes); tunnel
000 #1: "net-net" STATE_MAIN_I4 (ISAKMP SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 86050s; newest ISAKMP
000

Informações de rede

A interface tun0 é usada pelo servidor openvpn.

interface virbr1 é uma rede kvm

root@starfleet ~ # ip -4 a s
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN 
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
    inet XX.XX.XX.195/29 brd XX.XX.XX.199 scope global eth0
3: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 100
    inet 10.8.0.1 peer 10.8.0.2/32 scope global tun0
5: virbr1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP 
    inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global virbr1

root@starfleet ~ # ip -4 r s t 0
default via XX.XX.XX.193 dev eth0 
10.8.0.0/16 via 10.8.0.2 dev tun0 
10.8.0.2 dev tun0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.8.0.1 
XX.XX.XX.192/29 via XX.XX.XX.193 dev eth0 
XX.XX.XX.192/29 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src XX.XX.XX.195 
192.168.100.0/24 dev virbr1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.100.1 
local 10.8.0.1 dev tun0  table local  proto kernel  scope host  src 10.8.0.1 
broadcast XX.XX.XX.192 dev eth0  table local  proto kernel  scope link  src XX.XX.XX.195 
local XX.XX.XX.195 dev eth0  table local  proto kernel  scope host  src XX.XX.XX.195 
broadcast XX.XX.XX.199 dev eth0  table local  proto kernel  scope link  src XX.XX.XX.195 
broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo  table local  proto kernel  scope link  src 127.0.0.1 
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo  table local  proto kernel  scope host  src 127.0.0.1 
local 127.0.0.1 dev lo  table local  proto kernel  scope host  src 127.0.0.1 
broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo  table local  proto kernel  scope link  src 127.0.0.1 
broadcast 192.168.100.0 dev virbr1  table local  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.100.1 
local 192.168.100.1 dev virbr1  table local  proto kernel  scope host  src 192.168.100.1 
broadcast 192.168.100.255 dev virbr1  table local  proto kernel  scope link  srr 192.168.100.1

root@starfleet ~ # ip xfrm state
src XX.XX.XX.195 dst YY.YYY.YYY.155
    proto esp spi 0x8a12ab22 reqid 16384 mode tunnel
    replay-window 32 flag af-unspec
    auth-trunc hmac(sha1) 0x######################################## 96
    enc cbc(aes) 0x################################################################
src YY.YYY.YYY.155 dst XX.XX.XX.195
    proto esp spi 0xa01abba1 reqid 16384 mode tunnel
    replay-window 32 flag af-unspec
    auth-trunc hmac(sha1) 0x######################################## 96
    enc cbc(aes) 0x################################################################

root@starfleet ~ # ip xfrm policy
src 192.168.100.0/24 dst 172.30.20.0/27 
    dir out priority 1847 ptype main 
    tmpl src XX.XX.XX.195 dst YY.YYY.YYY.155
        proto esp reqid 16384 mode tunnel
src 172.30.20.0/27 dst 192.168.100.0/24 
    dir fwd priority 1847 ptype main 
    tmpl src YY.YYY.YYY.155 dst XX.XX.XX.195
        proto esp reqid 16384 mode tunnel
src 172.30.20.0/27 dst 192.168.100.0/24 
    dir in priority 1847 ptype main 
    tmpl src YY.YYY.YYY.155 dst XX.XX.XX.195
        proto esp reqid 16384 mode tunnel
src ::/0 dst ::/0 
    socket out priority 0 ptype main 
src ::/0 dst ::/0 
    socket in priority 0 ptype main 
src ::/0 dst ::/0 
    socket out priority 0 ptype main 
src ::/0 dst ::/0 
    socket in priority 0 ptype main 
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0 
    socket out priority 0 ptype main 
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0 
    socket in priority 0 ptype main 
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0 
    socket out priority 0 ptype main 
src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0 
    socket in priority 0 ptype main 

root@starfleet ~ # ip route show table 220
root@starfleet ~ # 

root@starfleet ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
0.0.0.0         XX.XX.XX.193    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
10.8.0.0        10.8.0.2        255.255.0.0     UG    0      0        0 tun0
10.8.0.2        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 tun0
XX.XX.XX.192    XX.XX.XX.193    255.255.255.248 UG    0      0        0 eth0
XX.XX.XX.192    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.248 U     0      0        0 eth0
192.168.100.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 virbr1

Iptables

root@starfleet ~ # iptables-save 
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.14 on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [11:368]
:INPUT ACCEPT [1:48]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [13:1012]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [13:1012]
-A POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/16 ! -d 10.8.0.0/16 -o virbr1 -j MASQUERADE
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.14 on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [271:19504]
:INPUT ACCEPT [261:19184]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [181:28686]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [181:28686]
-A POSTROUTING -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.14 on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [46:3380]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [36:5220]
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 172.30.20.0/27 -d 192.168.100.0/24 -i eth0 -m policy --dir in --pol ipsec --reqid 16384 --proto esp -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 172.30.20.0/27 -o eth0 -m policy --dir out --pol ipsec --reqid 16384 --proto esp -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 10.8.0.0/16 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o tun0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -d 192.168.100.0/24 -o virbr1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -s 192.168.100.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
-A FORWARD -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri May 24 16:07:39 2013

TcpDumping de 192.168.100.100 para 172.30.20.9

Todos os comandos estão sendo executados ao mesmo tempo.

root@enterprise:~# ping 172.30.20.9
PING 172.30.20.9 (172.30.20.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 172.30.20.9 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 4999ms

root@enterprise:~# tcpdump -v -n dst net 172.30.20.0/27
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
16:23:48.919819 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 1, length 64
16:23:49.918949 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 2, length 64
16:23:50.918950 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 3, length 64
16:23:51.918952 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 4, length 64
16:23:52.918954 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 5, length 64
16:23:53.918951 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
192.168.100.100 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 6, length 64

root@starfleet ~ # tcpdump -v -n dst net 172.30.20.0/27
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
16:23:50.475100 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 1, length 64
16:23:51.474262 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 2, length 64
16:23:52.474280 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 3, length 64
16:23:53.474251 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 4, length 64
16:23:54.474213 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 5, length 64
16:23:55.474173 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
XX.XX.XX.195 > 172.30.20.9: ICMP echo request, id 2605, seq 6, length 64
linux  vpn  kvm-virtualization  cisco-asa  strongswan 
— telemaco
fonte

Respostas:

10

A saída da tcpdumpsessão na frota estelar revela o problema. Devido à regra NAT aqui

-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 ! -d 192.168.100.0/24 -j MASQUERADE

a solicitação ICMP com endereço de origem 192.168.100.100é natada xx.xx.xx.195. Como a política IPsec negociada é para tráfego de 192.168.100.0/24e não xx.xx.xx.195esses pacotes não serão criptografados. Como pode ser visto neste esquema do fluxo de pacotes através do Netfilter, as regras na cadeia POSTROUTING na tabela nat são aplicadas antes de qualquer pesquisa de IPsec se transformar ( pesquisa de xfrm ).

Para corrigir isso, siga um destes procedimentos:

  • Excluir explicitamente o tráfego para a sub-rede de destino das regras MASQUERADE ( ! -d 172.30.20.0/27)

  • Adicione uma regra de isenção explícita antes das regras MASQUERADE

    -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -m policy --dir out --pol ipsec -j ACCEPT

  • Deixe as regras do MASQUERADE como estão, mas em leftsubnet=xx.xx.xx.195/32vez disso configure (requer ajuste da configuração na caixa Cisco ASA e não ajuda se um túnel site a site é realmente o seu objetivo)

— ecdsa
fonte
Obrigado pela sua resposta. Eu tentei os três conselhos, um por um, e não funciona. Eu abaixei todas as interfaces, exceto eth0 (limpei o iptables também) e apliquei o terceiro conselho e o tráfego não é roteado. Qualquer ideia?
— Telemaco 27/05
Finalmente, configurando leftsubnet = xx.xx.xx.195 / 32 e algumas configurações transversais nat no lado cisco asa, FUNCIONA! :) Obrigado
— telemaco
2

Minha situação é muito semelhante à descrita por @telemaco. Eu tenho algumas VMs de teste em execução no KVM no meu laptop. Meu laptop recebe seu endereço IP via DHCP, portanto, o endereço IP do ponto final da VPN é atribuído pelo Strongswan ao meu laptop via leftsourceip=%config.

As VMs usam uma rede privada 192.168.100.0/24. Meu laptop (host KVM) recebe o endereço IP 192.168.50.2/24via DHCP e um endereço IP 10.0.0.10/26do terminal da Strongswan.

As VMs devem acessar uma rede 192.168.0.0/24, que é roteada através da VPN.

Com base na resposta fornecida por @ecdsa, consegui este trabalho adicionando a seguinte regra:

-t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.10

No meu caso, ip xfrm policyfica assim (extrato):

src 192.168.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.10/32 
    dir fwd priority 2851 
    tmpl src xx.xx.xx.xx dst 192.168.50.2
        proto esp reqid 5 mode tunnel
src 192.168.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.10/32 
    dir in priority 2851 
    tmpl src xx.xx.xx.xx dst 192.168.50.2
        proto esp reqid 5 mode tunnel
src 10.0.0.10/32 dst 192.168.0.0/24 
    dir out priority 2851 
    tmpl src 192.168.50.2 dst xx.xx.xx.xx
        proto esp reqid 5 mode tunnel

Isso significa que apenas o endereço IP local 10.0.0.10possui uma xfrm lookupregra correspondente . É por isso que o NAT é necessário, a menos que a sub-rede da VM seja adicionada ao IPsec.

— Matthias Herlitzius
fonte
Ao utilizar nosso site, você reconhece que leu e compreendeu nossa Política de Cookies e nossa Política de Privacidade.
Licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.