quando


12

X eY são independentemente distribuídos variáveis aleatórias ondeXχ(n1)2 eYBeta(n21,n21). Qual é a distribuição deZ=(2Y1)X ?

A densidade conjunta de (X,Y) é dada por

fX,Y(x,y)=fX(x)fY(y)=ex2xn1212n12Γ(n12)yn22(1y)n22B(n21,n21)1{x>0,0<y<1}

Usando a mudança de variáveis (X,Y)(Z,W) modo que Z=(2Y1)X eW=X ,

Recebo a densidade articular de (Z,W) como

fZ,W(z,w)=ew22wn3(14z24w2)n222n12Γ(n12)B(n21,n21)1{w>0,|z|<w}

O pdf marginal de Z é então fZ(z)=|z|fZ,W(z,w)dw , o que não me leva a lugar algum.

Mais uma vez, ao encontrar a função de distribuição de Z , aparece uma função beta / gama incompleta:

FZ(z)=Pr(Zz)

=Pr((2Y1)Xz)=(2y1)xzfX,Y(x,y)dxdy

O que é uma mudança apropriada de variáveis ​​aqui? Existe outra maneira de encontrar a distribuição de ?Z

Tentei usar diferentes relações entre as distribuições Chi-Squared, Beta, 'F' e 't', mas nada parece funcionar. Talvez esteja faltando algo óbvio.


Como mencionado por @Francis, essa transformação é uma generalização da transformação Box-Müller.


4
Looks como uma generalização da transformação Box-Muller
Francis

Respostas:


10

Aqui está uma prova algébrica. Vou mas deixar que (não quadrado) de modo que precisamos encontrar Z : = ( 2 Y - 1 ) X . Todos têm garantia de densidades válidas, por isso não vou rastrear constantes de normalização. Temos f X , Y ( x , y ) α x n - 2 e - x 2 / 2 [ Y ( 1 - y ) ]Xχn1Z:=(2Y1)X Deixe queZ=(2y-1)XeW=Xentão as transformadas inversas sãox(z,w)=wey(z,w)= z + w

fX,Y(x,y)xn2ex2/2[y(1y)]n/221{0<x,0<y<1}.
Z=(2y1)XW=Xx(z,w)=w . Isso nos dá| J| =1y(z,w)=z+w2w=z2w+12 . Isto leva-nos a fZ,W(z,w)αwn-1e-W2/2[ z + w|J|=12wαwe-W2/2(w2-Z2)n/2-21{| z| <w}. Assim fZ(Z)ctw>| z| we-W2/2(w2-Z2)n
fZ,W(z,w)wn1ew2/2[z+w2w(1z+w2w)]n/221{0<w,1<zw<1}
wew2/2(w2z2)n/221{|z|<w}.
fZ(z)w>|z|wew2/2(w2z2)n/22dw.

m=n/22ez2/2

ez2/2fZ(z)|z|we(w2z2)/2(w2z2)mdw.
2u=w2z2 so du=wdw. This gives us
ez2/2fZ(z)2m0umeudu=2mΓ(m+1).
Because this final integral doesn't depend on z, we have shown that ez2/2fZ(z)1, therefore
ZN(0,1).

1
+1. I am glad you restored this answer, because it covers all values of n, not just integral ones.
whuber

@whuber thanks, I somehow put z2w2 instead of w2z2 and it took me a while to figure out why I was getting weird behavior when n is odd
jld

9

2Y1 is distributed like one coordinate of a uniform distribution on the n1 sphere; X has the distribution of the sum of squares of n1 iid standard Normal variates; and these two quantities are independent. Geometrically (2Y1)X has the distribution of one coordinate: that is, it must have a standard Normal distribution.

(This argument applies to integral n=2,3,4,.)

If you need some numerical convincing (which is always wise, because it can uncover errors in reasoning and calculation), simulate:

Figure showing four histograms for n=2,3,4,5

The agreement between the simulated results and the claimed standard Normal distribution is excellent across this range of values of n.

Experiment further with the R code that produced these plots if you wish.

n.sim <- 1e5
n <- 2:5
X <- data.frame(Z = c(sapply(n, function(n){
  y <- rbeta(n.sim, n/2-1, n/2-1)  # Generate values of Y
  x <- rchisq(n.sim, n-1)          # Generate values of X
  (2*y - 1) * sqrt(x)              # Return the values of Z
})), n=factor(rep(n, each=n.sim)))

library(ggplot2)
#--Create points along the graph of a standard Normal density
i <- seq(min(z), max(z), length.out=501)
U <- data.frame(X=i, Z=dnorm(i))

#--Plot histograms on top of the density graphs
ggplot(X, aes(Z, ..density..)) + 
  geom_path(aes(X,Z), data=U, size=1) +
  geom_histogram(aes(fill=n), bins=50, alpha=0.5) + 
  facet_wrap(~ n) + 
  ggtitle("Histograms of Simulated Values of Z",
          paste0("Sample size ", n.sim))

1
Thank you, @Stubborn. It does matter that the parameters are consistent, for otherwise the conclusion is incorrect. I'll fix it.
whuber

3

As user @Chaconne has already done, I was able to provide an algebraic proof with this particular transformation. I have not skipped any details.


(We already have n>2 for the density of Y to be valid).

Let us consider the transformation (X,Y)(U,V) such that U=(2Y1)X and V=X.

This implies x=v and y=12(uv+1).

Now, x>0v>0 and 0<y<1v<u<v,

so that the bivariate support of (U,V) is simply S={(u,v):0<u2<v<,uR}.

Absolute value of the Jacobian of transformation is |J|=12v.

Joint density of (U,V) is thus

fU,V(u,v)=ev2vn121(uv+1)n22(12u2v)n22Γ(n2)(2v)2n12+n22Γ(n12)(Γ(n21))21S

=ev2vn42(v+u)n22(vu)n22Γ(n2)22n32+n22(v)n4Γ(n12)(Γ(n22))21S

Now, using Legendre's duplication formula,

Γ(n2)=2n3πΓ(n22)Γ(n22+12)=2n3πΓ(n22)Γ(n12) where n>2.

So for n>2,

fU,V(u,v)=2n3ev2(vu2)n22π23n72Γ(n21)1S

Marginal pdf of U is then given by

fU(u)=12n12πΓ(n21)u2ev2(vu2)n22dv

=eu222n12πΓ(n21)0et2t(n211)dt

=12n12π(12)n21eu22

=12πeu2/2,uR

2

This is more of a black box answer (i.e., the algebraic details are missing) using Mathematica. In short as @whuber states the answer is that the distribution of Z is a standard normal distribution.

(* Transformation *)
f = {(2 y - 1) Sqrt[x], Sqrt[x]};
sol = Solve[{z == (2 y - 1) Sqrt[x], w == Sqrt[x]}, {x, y}][[1]]
(*{x -> w^2,y -> (w+z)/(2 w)} *)
(* Jacobian *)
J = D[f, {{x, y}}]

(* Joint pdf of Z and W *)
{jointpdf, conditions} = FullSimplify[PDF[BetaDistribution[n/2 - 1, n/2 - 1], y] 
  PDF[ChiSquareDistribution[n - 1], x] Abs[Det[J]] /. sol,
  Assumptions -> {w >= 0, 0 <= y <= 1}][[1, 1]]

(* Integrate over W *)
Integrate[jointpdf Boole[conditions], {w, 0, \[Infinity]}, Assumptions -> {n > 2, z == 0}]
(* 1/Sqrt[2 \[Pi]] *)

Integrate[jointpdf Boole[conditions], {w, 0, \[Infinity]}, Assumptions -> {n > 2, z > 0}]
(* Exp[-(z^2/2)]/Sqrt[2 \[Pi]] *)

Integrate[jointpdf Boole[conditions], {w, 0, \[Infinity]}, Assumptions -> {n > 2, z < 0}]
(* Exp[-(z^2/2)]/Sqrt[2 \[Pi]] *)

1

Not an answer per se, but it may be worthwhile to point out the connection to Box-Muller transformation.

Consider the Box-Muller transformation Z=2lnUsin(2πV), where U,VU(0,1). We can show that lnUExp(1), i.e. 2lnUχ22. On the other hand, we can show that sin(2πV) has the location-scale arcsine distribution, which agrees with the distribution of 2B(1/2,1/2)1. This means Box-Muller transformation is a special case of (2Y1)X when n=3.

Related:

Ao utilizar nosso site, você reconhece que leu e compreendeu nossa Política de Cookies e nossa Política de Privacidade.
Licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.